Page 86
The provided text appears to be a jumbled mix of OCR errors and nonsensical text. It is not possible to correct the text without understanding the original content.
However, towards the end of the text, there is a coherent section that appears to be a legal document or a bill. The text is as follows:
Clause 10.
Clause 11.
Clause 12.
periods in which the Court of Appeal will be sitting I have thus amended the Ordinance so as to provide for the Sessions being held every alternate month. This will not inflict any hardship on prisoners. The existing monthly Session in my opinion in any case is undesirable and I understand that my predecessors shared this view.
Reserves to the Divisional Court (formerly the Full Court) certain appellate jurisdiction which it is submitted it should possess.
Sub-section 2. This procedure is based in short on section 607 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Sub-section 3. This limits the time for appeals under (b) and (c). The time for appeals under (a) is dealt with in clause 13.
This vests appeals from Magistrates in the Divisional Court.
Gives a casting vote to the Chief Justice when the two Judges differ in the Divisional Court (vide section 24 of Supreme Court Ordinance 1873 to be repealed by this Bill).
Provides for appeals from the Divisional Court to the Court of Appeal when the two Judges differ and it makes Part IV of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to appeals apply mutatis mutandis to appeals from the Divisional Court to the Court of Appeal as well to appeals under the next succeeding section (i.e. clause 12) from a Judge sitting alone (clause 5 substitutes in the Code the term "The Court of Appeal" for "The Full Court").
Defines the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal.
Mr.
...
v.
نا
86
0.0
* III a no Istenen- «sarna (A edd to droga”
end to entsolbin to two? eritma ada to not?-
8853
nolob
not ablvo“;
-700 88859 fem, a mi dla of snbul b-bit a to nemdinloggs sit
#t
To asmbir? erit not oberi trazennanna odd no dasupea-
rut nnox no” #tube of lavenant de duob alyjenḥat
dne sumkej sa in enhet brid a to inenratoqis erit to veli ni
."nofol and to merrieilɗazas
Jauh a net asbiyong Vdireasmoen (Ill sp
add asonsNÁDYÓ nnkantes e 13 tekur en bna moljolbaltuį, ets'laq 8
I nolo suff to me bil, one mulð oð æstf A "duo" [[p" miej
end" do? Inn ut ve' end exec od dustpigra 1) bemaab overt
owd to mabreixmoo) dhuron Ilum matèrixa sið bna "Imnuqh to druod
Marion Isnobe)+}@ mia" feambut
2
Clause 8.
obama. Ink el' to enbart a" ebrow wit
. sausio
Clause 9.
I aa bezit 978 "O`
ors anddy to otro menque
vauch víc anitnon or aldantazhou al 3? busÉÍSTOVS
.V[no anhirt, tukish arts of
thestah ow.
aidattua taom .. mate as Taff wit d be.ge-mi
=fit to no dent cost ada na branes naiwas zud
T mofob :'t el treblɛer ed for filw as- hist.
As of Janjd a" asisb
R
anit aba
gd eba erits of Britð port ad
I jud "es-bul. dt newWJ
ser dobów zinen-
JHANSAMANNA ISUJA
red and to atshami and Jars bbs Tereworf bloa
vis ini? h ed hloda med. b níít tærð anti! VI»no`ta
eldart: ebru sc blow vinterreg Ji ber bexit
.80025e7 Junnoo not jusoce med? India
Land 10 and not sobivomi Jueaning to mat E.
HÈ LIEW Ji bus dino mere hted mated anolese2
owd and madruth on oh od midterɔqni od dr VO VIS
0.
Clause 10.
Clause 11.
Clause 12.
periods in which the Court of Appeal will be
sitting I have thus amended the Ordinance so as
to provide for the Sessions being held every
alternate month. This will not inflict any hard-
-ship on prisoners. The existing monthly Session
in my opinion in any case is undesirable and I
understand that my predecessors shared this view.
Reserves to the Divisional Court (formerly the
Pull Court) certain appellate jurisdiction which
it is submitted it should poss8038 -
Sub-section 2. This procedure is based in
short on section 607 of the Code of
Civil Procedure.
Sub-section 3. This limits the time for
appeals under (b) and (c). The time
for appeals under (a) is dealt with
in clause 13.
This vests appeals from Magistrates in the
Divisional Court.
Gives a casting vote to the Chief Justice when
the two Judges differ in the Divisional Court
(vide section 24 of Supreme Court Ordinance
1873 to he repealed by this Bill).
Provides for appeals from the Divisional Court
to the Court of Appeal when the two Judges
differ and it makes Part IV of the Code of
Civil Procedure relating to appeals apply mutatis
mutandis to apreals from the Divisional Court to
the Court of Appeal as well to appeals under the
next succeeding section (1.8. clause 12) from a
Judge sitting alone (clause 5 substitutes in the
Code the term "The Court of Apreal" for "The
Pull Court").
Defines the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal.
Mr.
anottag
v.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.